Social News – COVID-19 Testing
COVID-19 Virus
The SARS-CoV-2 virus genome was “leaked” by the Chinese in January 2020. (NCBI GenBank)
COVID-19 is the disease (COronaVIrus Disease 2019). SARS-CoV-2 is the virus that allegedly causes COVID-19.
“Allegedly” because today it is assumed (without proof) under state of emergency action that the SARS-CoV-2 virus causes COVID-19 illness. See AO COVID-19 Origin Story.
Scientifically the SARS-CoV-2 virus has never been isolated, does not have a gold standard, does not meet Koch’s postulates and does not pass peer-review. (article) (Dr. Thomas Cowan) (Dr. Sam Bailey) (article) (Dr. Robert O. Young)
Dr. Thomas Cowan points out that the “whole genome” was derived of “37 base pairs from unpurified samples using PCR probes. This means they actually looked at 37 out of the approximately 30,000 of the base pairs that are claimed to be the genome of the intact virus. They then took these 37 segments and put them into a computer program, which filled in the rest of the base pairs.” (article)
Dr. Cowan also notes that a report published by the USA’s Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) indicates that scientists could not get the SARS-CoV-2 virus to infect human tissue cultures. (article)
Dr. Tim O’Shea gives an overview of testing (15 mins) and notes that “the fact remains none of these tests is scientifically verifiable and reproducible as a valid differentiation for COVID-19 specifically. They are all flawed, and they’re just estimates.” (video (mark 4:59 mins))
Critics say the tests are magnifying small fragments of DNA from numerous enzymes that are not exclusive to SARS-CoV-2. (article) (article) (article)
People ask why does COVID-19 testing require a hurtful swab up the nose when a throat swab or saliva test should suffice? (article)
Ultimately, critics ask, does SARS-CoV-2 really exist? (article) (Icke/Dr. Andrew Kaufman video (54 mins)) (Icke/Dr. Andrew Kaufman video (47 mins)) (article)
If SARS-CoV-2 hasn’t been isolated or doesn’t exist outside a laboratory, how can vaccines be developed? (AO News - Vaccines)
A retracted pubmed study links 5G with coronavirus in skin cells (article) (AO News – EMR Health)
Testing for COVID-19
In most cases (in fact, in almost all cases) the presence/absence of the COVID-19 virus is established by symptoms diagnosis or indirect testing. The indirect tests are commonly known as PCR and antibody tests. Without going into technical details, one may consider that these tests monitor specific types of proteins or related chemicals which are produced by the presence of viruses, not only by SARS-CoV2 or COVID-19, but by all pathogenic viruses as a defence mechanism to get rid of the viruses and/or to protect our bodies from their ill effects. It is important to note here that when someone refers to testing for a virus, one does not determine the actual virus itself but a marker (such as a protein). (article)
SARS-CoV-2 testing was established under state of emergency conditions despite known limitations.
“No COVID-19 test is 100% accurate.” William F. Marshall, III M.D. mayoclinic.org
Currently there are two broad types of tests for SARS-CoV-2:
1. Tests to diagnose active infection (PCR tests (molecular), antigen tests)
2. Tests for post-infection antibodies (antibody tests (serology/blood tests))
1. Tests to Diagnose Active Infection
A test to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 that determines if you currently have the disease. According to www.mayoclinic.org in the USA, the FDA approved two types of tests for diagnosing COVID-19 — molecular and antigen: (source)
- Molecular test. This test detects genetic material of the virus using a lab technique called polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Also called a PCR test, a health care worker collects fluid from a nasal or throat swab or from saliva. Results may be available in minutes if analyzed onsite or one to two days if sent to an outside lab. Molecular tests are considered very accurate when properly performed by a health care professional, but the rapid test appears to miss some cases. The FDA also approved certain COVID-19 at-home test kits, available only with doctor approval: A nasal swab kit and a saliva kit. The sample is mailed to a lab for testing. The FDA warns consumers against buying unapproved home tests, because they may be inaccurate and unsafe. AO News – PCR Testing
- Antigen test. Rapid diagnostic testing that isn’t as sensitive as molecular tests. This newer COVID-19 test detects certain proteins that are part of the virus. Using a nasal or throat swab to get a fluid sample, antigen tests can produce results in minutes. Because these tests are faster and less expensive than molecular tests are, some experts consider antigen tests more practical to use for large numbers of people. According to Mayoclinic.org, a positive antigen test result is considered very accurate, but there’s an increased chance of false-negative results — meaning it’s possible to be infected with the virus but have negative results. According to webmd.com antigen tests have a higher risk of false positives (meaning that they’re more likely to say you have the infection when you don’t). Depending on the situation, the doctor may recommend a molecular test to confirm an antigen test result. (article)
PCR Tests (molecular)
For more information: AO News – PCR Testing
Antigen/Rapid Antigen Tests
Between March and September 2020, only a single rapid, point-of-care test had been approved by Canadian regulators. Following pressure from public health experts and Ontario Premier Doug Ford, Health Canada has since approved four more rapid testing devices. (article) Rapid tests are less accurate than molecular/PCR tests.
Abbott Panbio Ag rapid antigen screening test for COVID-19 - identifies “potentially contagious patients in 15 minutes”, features “patient-friendly nasal or nasopharyngeal sample collection types”, is most accurate on days 0-3 after symptom onset or suspected exposure, and slightly less accurate in detecting positive cases on days 4-7. The product is not available in all countries and not approved for sale in the USA. (Abbott website)
Rapid Antigen Tests was designed to diagnose symptomatic people and not for screening purposes, however, the Ontario government is using the tests to screen asymptomatic peoples. (video [mark 3:25])
RATs manufacturer’s (Abbott) cost $16 and are sold for $40 - $99 – plenty of profit (video [mark 11:45])
“These tests can only yield true positives if there is such a high viral load that the person would obviously be symptomatic, and yet only asymptomatic people are allowed to use this test. Therefore, companies are making massive profits for something that has absolutely no public health value.” Dr. Byram Bridle (video [mark 12:40])
FDA-Authorized Antigen Diagnostic Tests for SARS-CoV-2
News - Antigen/Rapid Antigen Tests
(most recent first)
|
Date |
Source |
Title |
Comment |
|
2022-02-24 |
Government of Canada |
Rapid antigen test kits and potential exposure to hazardous substances
|
|
|
2022-01-05 |
Bitchute / WellnessForumHealth Pam Popper |
Dr. Pam Popper |
|
|
2021-11-26 |
Bitchute / Poweredbyjeep |
|
- Rapid antigen test [3:25] designed to diagnose symptomatic people and not for screening purposes - Rapid antigen test recommended by ON Health for asymptomatic screening - Concise explanation of PCR test and cycle threshold [10:20] - Ontario using cycle threshold up to 38 - Masks [16:00]
|
|
2021-06-10 |
fda.gov (USA) |
|
Class I recall “Use of these devices may cause serious injuries or death” |
|
2021-03-23 |
Bitchute / T00M |
Antigen-test unter dem mikroskop – parastien? Nanobots? – Nein – Morgellons (6 mins)
|
|
|
2021-02-10 |
CBC News |
Millions of rapid COVID tests gather dust as some provinces use a fraction of their supply
|
Peter Zimonjic, Vassy Kapelos “Horgan told reporters today that his province's reluctance to use rapid tests extensively is tied to findings in his province that they are resulting in high rates of false positives and false negatives.” |
|
2021-01-27 |
Bitchute / Truth Archive 2030 |
|
|
|
2020-12-27 |
Bitchute / Philosophers-stone.info |
Scientists use later flow antigen rapid “SARSCOV2 test” on a kiwi fruit (3 mins)
|
Let me introduce to you the Italian scientists who tested the kiwi 🥝 Dr. Mariano Amici, doctor & surgeon https://t.co/ykYOGO6etK Dr Stefano Scoglio, Nobel candidate 2018, research director Urbino University https://t.co/0qf2rAQVth Domenico d’Angelo. Chemistry expert technician” – from Robin Monotti |
|
2020-11-30 |
Barrietoday.com |
ONTARIO: 22 per cent of rapid COVID-19 tests in Ontario reporting false negatives, experts say
|
Alex Goudge |
|
2020-11-25 |
Bitchute / OurFreeSociety |
Apple Juice Tests Positive for COVID-19 using Rapid Tests in Poland (2 mins)
|
OurFreeSociety |
|
2020-11-24 |
Government of Ontario |
- 98,000 ID NOW - 1.2 mln Panbio rapid antigen tests Both tests by Abbott |
|
|
2020-11-13 |
RT.com |
|
|
|
2020-10-11 |
CBC News |
As parts of Canada tighten COVID restrictions, experts say rapid testing offers a way forward
|
John Paul Tasker |
|
2020-10-06 |
CBC News |
Health Canada approves first rapid antigen COVID-19 test
|
John Paul Tasker |
|
2020-09-29 |
CBC News |
Feds announce plan to buy 7.9 million rapid COVID tests as Health Canada defends slow response
|
John Paul Tasker
|
UK Direct LAMP test (Optigene) and rapid lateral flow tests (Innova) latter distinctly says should not be used in community settings – WHO says should focus on sick people
? Coca-Cola, Absolut Vodka, lemon water cause positive results with lateral flow tests? [AO Comment - Coke Zero tested negative]
2. Tests for post-infection antibodies
Antibody/Serology Tests
Human bodies make proteins known as antibodies found in the blood when they are fighting an infection. An antibody test (aka serology test or blood test) does not look for the virus itself, instead it looks for the antibodies showing that there has been a response to infection.
After a person has been infected with SARS-CoV-2, they will typically develop antibodies within 7 to 10 days. With SARS-CoV-2, the antibodies seem to disappear in many individuals after 3 to 6 months following an infection. Joseph F. Petrosino, PhD, chairman of the Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology at the Baylor College of Medicine. (article)
To be absolutely clear, antibody tests are not helpful in diagnosing current COVID-19 infection. (article)
According to www.webmd.com: (source)
- a test looks for one or both kinds of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2: (i) IgM antibodies (which happen early in an infection), (ii) IgG antibodies (which are more likely to show up later).
- most people have IgG antibodies about 14 days after symptoms start. They usually stay in your blood long after the infection goes away, but we don’t know how long that is for the new coronavirus.
- It’s important to note that some tests can mistake IgM antibodies from other coronaviruses, such as common cold strains, for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.
- Testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies probably means you’ve had the virus. It’s also possible to get a “false positive” if you have antibodies but had a different kind of coronavirus. A positive result might mean you have some immunity to the coronavirus. It’s too early to know how strong it is or how long it might last.
- Testing negative means you haven’t come into contact with the virus or you haven’t had it long enough to make antibodies. You could also have been exposed and not have antibodies -- this is called a “false negative”.
According to www.mayoclinic.org: (source)
- The level of immunity and how long immunity lasts are not yet known.
- The timing and type of antibody test affects accuracy. If you have testing too early in the course of infection, when the immune response is still building up in your body, the test may not detect antibodies, so you may have to wait several days to get tested. Also, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized and verified certain antibody tests, but many tests with questionable accuracy are now on the market.
News – Antibody/Serology Tests
|
Date |
Source |
Title |
Comment |
|
2022-03-04 |
National Post |
New test helping individuals determine their level of COVID-19 antibodies (Sponsored)
|
Fiona Roossien - Elecsys test reagent is synthetic form of spike protein [all vaxxed are generating toxic spike proteins (?)]
|
|
2020-10-20 |
Youtube / Joyne Freedom |
"Doctor Mike" Admits Some Testing Problems (2 mins)
|
Dr. “Mike” Mikhail Varshavski |
|
2020-10-02 |
Verywellhealth.com |
This Is When You Should Get a COVID-19 Antibody Test
|
Korin Miller |
|
2020-10-01 |
Verywellhealth.com |
FDA Authorizes First Point-of-Care Antibody Test for COVID-19 |
Korin Miller - Drop of blood, 15 mins - Assure COVID-19 IgG/IgM Rapid Test fingerstick blood test |
Note that antibody tests will not be unable to distinguish between people who have been infected and those who are vaccinated. (www.canada.ca)
Laboratories
A look inside a laboratory analyzing COVID test samples. According to the Global News video (8 mins) there are 26 (public health?) laboratories in Ontario. Information from the Ontario government indicated that there are around 40 laboratories (includes commercial facilities?) conducting sample analysis.
|
Date |
Source |
Title |
Comment |
|
2020-09-14 |
Youtube.com |
- 2500 tests per day - PCR processing takes about 1 hr - one test for influenza A & B, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), COVID combined (video mark 7:59) |
|
|
2020-08-21 |
Youtube.com |
- 3 samples/primer sets per patient: 2 testing for SARS-CoV-2, 1 confirming human sample (mark 2:41) |
|
|
2020-05-24 |
Youtube.com |
|
Note that the positive/negative references in the Global News video are oversimplified especially when detected at more than 25 cycles. PCR test results should be analyzed in conjunction with other information such as “timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.” (WHO article)
Swabs
Warning: some swabs are being sterilized with ethylene oxide (EO) = carcinogenic
Graphene oxide found in swabs? (article) (article)
|
Date |
Source |
Title |
Comment |
|
2021-06-09 |
Bitchute / EarthNewspaper.com |
WHO Whistleblower Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger Interviewed by Planet Lockdown (19 mins)
|
[mark 9:40] – can take saliva for DNA, swab is deliberately close to the brain
|
|
2021-05-21 |
Eastonspectator.com |
|
Cassandra S. Dunn, RN (bio) |
|
2021-03-23 |
Bitchute / T00M |
Antigentest – Doch Parastiten? Echt Jetzt? – Morgellons! (3 mins)
|
|
|
2021-03-23 |
Bitchute / T00M |
Antigen-test unter dem mikroskop – parastien? Nanobots? – Nein – Morgellons (6 mins)
|
|
|
2021-03-25 |
Bitchute / wil paranormal |
|
|
|
2021-02-21 |
Bitchute / DemonHunter |
Darpa Nano / Morgellon fibers found in PCR Swab Test; extremely disturbing!!! (19 mins)
|
|
Accuracy of Tests
Scientifically the SARS-CoV-2 virus has never been isolated, does not have a gold standard (a 100% reliable standard as comparison), does not meet Koch’s postulates and does not pass peer-review.
The testing is known to be unreliable and inaccurate. No COVID-19 test is 100% accurate. (source) (article)
“Up to 90 percent of people [PCR] testing positive carried barely any virus.” Apoorva Mandavilli, New York Times
“Casedemic” when positive tests are counted as cases but do not mean illness or death. (video) (article)
Antigen tests: Low test sensitivity. Samples can be poor with nasal swabs. Challenge is finding the right antibodies with which to compare. (source)
Australian Government Department of Health Statement
Accuracy of Tests
• SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests are high-fidelity tests designed for maximal sensitivity and minimal off-target
reactivity. RT-PCR tests are the gold standard for diagnostic SARS-CoV-2 testing in Australia. Available
evidence for the reliability of RT-PCR tests mainly comes from symptomatic patients. The test’s clinical
role in detecting asymptomatic carriers is still unclear given these in vitro diagnostic devices were not
designed for screening.
• As community prevalence of COVID-19 falls and the rate of asymptomatic testing increases, the
proportion of false positive results may increase. However, it is important to note that PHLN emphasises
the likelihood of false positive and false negative results occurring is still low.
Other Information Sources
Centers for Disease Control (USA) - Overview of Testing for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19)
Accuracy of COVID-19 Tests
Positive Test Statement
“All positives [test results] are meaningless because they have not isolated the virus.”
Rocco Galati, lawyer for Vaccine Choice Canada et al. lawsuit to hold the governments of Canada and Ontario accountable
(video 1 hr 22 mins) [mark 20:16]
Mass Testing Statement
Current mass testing using the PCR test is inappropriate in its current form. If it is to continue, then results and reporting should be refined to meet the gold standard of testing methodology to give clinicians improved information so that they are able to make appropriate clinical decisions. Positive tests should be confirmed by testing a second sample and all positive tests should be reported along with the Cycle Threshold (Ct) obtained during the test to aid assessment of a patient’s viral load.
The PCR test for the virus is good enough to confirm infection in someone with symptoms. “Is it flu or is it COVID-19?” is a question easily answered. What it is very poor at, however, is what is being asked of it now, namely estimating the percentage of people who are currently infectious in the community.
The result of continuing to use this test alone on a massive widescale screening program is inevitably to generate a high proportion of false positives.
Paul Kirkham, Professor of cell Biology and Head of Respiratory Disease Research Group at Wolverhampton University
Dr Mike Yeadon, former CSO and VP, Allergy and Respiratory Research Head with Pfizer Global R&D and co-Founder of Ziarco Pharma Ltd
Barry Thomas, Epidemiologist
September 7, 2020
(source) (video 13 mins)
Mutations / Variants
“There’s no such thing as a non-mutated virus.” Dr. David Rasnick, USA (video 90 mins mark 16:33)
|
Date |
Source |
Title |
Comment |
|
2021-02-23 |
CNBC.com |
From escape mutations to wild strains: Here’s everything you need to know about Covid variants
|
Noah Higgins-Dunn - variants: UK (B.1.1.7), South Africa (B.1.351), Brazil (P.1) - mutation: N501Y, E484K - [propaganda at its best featuring Bill Gates] |
|
2021-02-16 |
msn.com |
Study: Researchers identify 7 new U.S.-based coronavirus variants
|
Heidi Wigdahl |
|
2020-05-06 |
Nbcnews.com |
The coronavirus appears to have mutated. What does that mean for contagiousness? |
Erika Edwards - Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico - Mutation: D614G |
|
2020-04-30 |
Biorxiv.org |
Spike mutation pipeline reveals the emergence of a more transmissible form of SARS-CoV-2 |
Korber, Fischer, Yoon et al - Not peer reviewed |
NEWS - General: Testing for SARS-CoV-2
|
Date |
Source |
Title |
Comment |
|
2021-12-31 |
DailyMail.com |
|
Katelyn Caralle, Brian Stieglitz |
|
2021-11-25 |
City News |
A traveller's warning about Air Canada-promoted Switch Health COVID-19 test kits
|
Dilshad Burman - The Switch Health test involves a self-administered nasal swab that is conducted while on video call with a nurse from the company. - Switch Health reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification test (RT-LAMP) - PCR alternative available to Air Canada Aeroplan members |
|
2021-07-20 |
zerohedge.com |
Why Are Soros And Gates Buying UK COVID Testing Company?
|
Tyler Durden |
|
2021-07-19 |
Forbes.com |
George Soros And Bill Gates’ Backed Consortium To Buy U.K. Maker Of Covid Tests For $41 Million
|
David Dawkins |
|
2021-02-24 |
Brighteon.com / Wardo Rants |
Creepy Reaction in the Test Swab (7 mins)
|
Morgellons parasite AO News COVID-testing |
|
2021-01-21 |
Rebel News |
|
Tamara Ugolini - Min. of Health pilot project to implement mandatory testing for all workers - Panbio rapid antigen screening test |
|
2020-12-14 |
Bitchute / wil paranormal |
The Most Important Video You’ll Ever See – This Will Shock and Awaken Everyone to the Core (42 mins)
|
Wil Paranormal NWO, PCR, made-up science |
|
2020-11-14 |
Lewrockwell.com |
Why COVID-19 Testing Is a Tragic Waste
|
Joseph Mercola |
|
2020-11-03 |
Silview.media |
Yes, They Can Vaccinate Us Through Nasal Test Swabs and Target the Brain
|
Silviu “Silview” Costinescu “Researchers engineer tiny machines that deliver medicine efficiently” Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine |
|
2020-10-14 |
BBC News (UK) |
Used coronavirus tests handed out by mistake in Birmingham
|
|
|
2020-10-11 |
Principia Scientific International |
Even CDC Now Admits No ‘Gold Standard’ Of COVID19 Virus Isolate
|
John O’Sullivan - Jon Rappoport |
|
Bitchute / Spiro Skouras |
We are being lied to! Here is how … (26 mins)
|
Spiro Skouras - Dr. Kary Mullis, |
|
|
2020-10-01 |
Bitchute / David Icke (UK) |
David Icke Talks to Dr. Andrew Kaufman About the UK Government’s Colossal Testing Scam |
- Dr. Andrew Kaufman - Operation Moonshot - UK’s goal to test 10 million people daily; the entire population on a weekly basis |
|
2020-09-25 |
Activistpost.com |
Coronavirus Testing Suspended at Boston Lab Due to Nearly 400 False Positives
|
BN Frank |
|
2020-09-24 |
Youtube / Pamela Popper (USA) |
Pam Popper - mark 8:17 incentivized $ - inaccurate test, incompetent companies |
|
|
2020-09-24 |
Government of Ontario |
Ontario Updates COVID-19 Testing Guidelines
|
Dr. Barbara Yaffe, Associate Chief Medical Officer of Health |
|
2020-09-24 |
DurhamRegion.com |
34 people in Durham got incorrect positive COVID-19 results this past weekend
|
Jillian Follert |
|
2020-09-23 |
Government of Ontario |
Ontario Expands COVID-19 Testing to Pharmacies
|
Office of the Premier Keeping Ontarians Safe plan |
|
2020-09-21 |
TheStar.com |
A 15-minute COVID-19 test kit was recently approved in the U.S. — why is Canada so far behind?
|
Rosa Saba - Abbott Panbio |
|
2020-09-17 |
Bitchute / WellnessForumHealth |
Testing, Government Assessment of Testing and Consequences of Testing (16 mins)
|
Pam Popper |
|
2020-09-17 |
Youtube / talkRadio |
|
Dr. Mike Yeadon |
|
2020-09-09 |
Youtube / Pamela Popper |
Testing and Adjusting the Numbers. What is Going On? (13 mins)
|
Pamela Popper - mark 1:40 mins |
|
2020-09-08 |
Youtube / Ivor Cummins |
Viral Issue Crucial Update Sept 8th: the Science, Logic and Data Explained! (38 mins) |
Ivor Cummins statistics & analysis [mark 24:12] “casedemic” |
|
2020-09-08 |
Verywellhealth.com |
New $5, 15-Minute Coronavirus Test Makes a Case for Rapid Testing
|
Kristen Fischer |
|
2020-09-07 |
Lockdown Sceptics |
|
Kirkham, Yeadon, Thomas |
|
2020-08-29 |
Youtube / Cabin Talk |
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, lawyer - testing @ mark 7:35 |
|
|
2020-08-29 |
New York Times |
Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be.
|
Apoorva Mandavilli |
|
2020-08-24 |
Cdc.gov |
Overview of Testing for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19)
|
Diagnostic testing categories edited |
|
2020-08-24 |
Bitchute/David Icke |
“Virus” Test Revelations With David Icke and Andrew Kaufman (54 mins) |
David Icke / Andrew Kaufman RT-PCR Test |
|
2020-08-23 |
Bgr.com |
New guidelines say coronavirus antibody tests are pointless
|
Chris Smith |
|
2020-08-14 |
Principia-scientific.com |
Our Pharmaceutical Emperors Have No Clothes
|
Saeed A. Qureshi PhD |
|
2020-08-06 |
Principia-scientific.com |
COVID-19: Vaccine ‘Not Possible’ For A Virus Not Yet Quantifiable
|
Saeed A. Qureshi PhD |
|
2020-08-05 |
Centre for Evidence-Base Medicine (CEBM) |
Are you infectious if you have a positive PCR test result for COVID-19?
|
Jefferson, Heneghan, Spencer, Brassey |
|
2020-07-31 |
Youtube / BrightCanNews |
No Mandatory Testing for Ontario Teachers Due to 50% False-Positive Rate (1 min)
|
Dr. Yaffe, government of Ontario |
|
2020-07-27 |
Bitchute / sentinel / Inforwars.com |
How Everyone Will Test Positive for COVID-19 (3 mins)
|
Greg Reese
|
|
2020-07-15 |
Collective Evolution |
OPINION“COVID-19 PCR Tests Are Scientifically Meaningless” Says Bulgarian Pathology Association
|
Arjun Walia |
|
2020-06-27 |
Off-guardian.org |
COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless
|
Torsten Engelbrecht, Konstantin Demeter |
|
2020-05-02 |
Youtube / Spiro Skouras |
Dr. Tenpenny: This is The Biggest Scam Ever Perpetrated on the Human Race (mark 24:25)
|
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny |
|
2020-04-21 |
Fox News |
Coronavirus has mutated into at least 30 different strains new study finds |
Christopher Carbone - Prof Li Lanjuan - study |
|
2020-04-16 |
CBC News |
Thousands of contaminated test kits delivered to New Brunswick
|
Shane Magee |
|
2020-04-19 |
Seattle Times (USA) |
UW Medicine halts use of coronavirus testing kits airlifted from China after some had contamination
|
Evan Bush |
|
2020-03-22 |
Dnalymetest.com |
|
Dr. Sin Hang Lee |
|
2020-03-17 |
ChinaDaily.com.cn |
Liu Zhihua - Real-Time Fluorescent RT-PCR kits - Wondfo SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Test |
|
|
2020-03-03 |
Motley Fool |
Faulty COVID-19 Test Kits Tilt Scales in Coronavirus's Favor
|
Cory Renauer |
For more information:
AO COVID-19 – What do Doctors Say?
Link to AWARE-Ontario COVID-19 News
Link to AWARE-Ontario.ca Home Page
List of Ontario’s Issues
Disclaimer: This information has been compiled through private amateur research for the purpose of allowing the reader to make an informed and educated decision. However, while the information is believed to be reliable, completeness and accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
https://awareontario.nfshost.com/AWARE-Ontario/Issues/Soc_Miscellaneous/C19_Testing.htm
APPENDIX B (PCR Comment)
Scientifically the SARS-CoV-2 virus has never been isolated, does not have a gold standard, does not meet Koch’s postulates and does not pass peer-review. PCR testing is known to be unreliable and inaccurate with significant false positives. "Cases" does not mean illness or death and therefore means nothing. Increasing the number of tests equals an increased number of cases equals a "casedemic" and not a "pandemic". All is not as it seems in the mainstream.
APPENDIX C (Opinion)
Rapid antigen tests are considered less accurate than PCR tests with more false negatives. PCR tests have more false positives especially if the cycle threshold is greater than 24. There are videos showing rapid antigen tests that test a kiwi fruit and Coca-Cola as positives.
Neither type of test actually tests for SARS-Cov-2 since the virus has not been isolated from a human so there is no gold standard for comparison.
Personally, I would avoid all testing if possible. Some swabs have been sterilized with ethylene oxide (EO), which is carcinogenic. Some swabs have parasites. Some swabs shed plastic micro fibres.
If they insist, you could state that Canadians have the inherent right to refuse unwanted medical testing and intervention. These rights are protected under section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, as well as all provincial health acts, professional codes of ethics and international agreements such as the Nuremberg Code and Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights. Insist on informed consent and ask to see the package, the package insert, look for "EO" and research the other ingredients. Find out what happens to the tests -- are they collecting DNA? Delay, delay, delay. 😊
At the very least, do not allow the swab up your nose, which damages the blood/brain barrier. Insist on using spit. Afterall if you need a mask to stop spitting on people and giving them COVID then a saliva test should suffice. Good luck.