Climate Change
The foremost political and media touted issue of our time, until COVID-19 happened, is “climate change”. The climate has always changed and will continue to do so.
The planet is in a warming period (versus an ice age), and it has been theorized that climate change has been accelerated by greenhouse gases released by human-caused fossil fuel combustion.
The issue of human-caused (aka anthropogenic) climate change is controversial and hotly debated although the mainstream media plays down all serious opposition to the proponents. (AO News - Censorship)
Questions remain. Has climate change actually been exacerbated by human activity?
Does anthropogenic burning and mining of fossil fuels have material effects? (AO News – Oil & Gas)
Are the changes to climate beneficial or damaging? For instance, CO2 is required for plant growth.
If the climate changes are damaging, what should we do about it?
Is climate change being deliberately instigated by human activity through geoengineering / solar radiation management? (Climate Engineering)
Is climate change simply another trendy bandwagon? (article)
Is climate change an excuse to garner limitless funding and roll-out a global administration known as the Great Reset / New World Order? (AO News – Great Reset)
Do Climate Scientists Agree?
Always ask, who has the most to gain? Who has the most to lose? Who is funding the research? Is the research independent, expert, and reliable?
Some Say ‘Yes’
Article: Scientists Reach 100% Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming (link 2)
Youtube: 97% of Climate Scientists Agree (6:54)
The Weather Channel: 87 Percent of Americans Unaware There's Scientific Consensus on Climate Change (2017)
USA’s National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) (https://climate.nasa.gov)
Some Say ‘No’
Science is not about consensus – science is about facts.
The issue of “climate change” has become politicized and those who go against the mainstream narrative are considered “Climate Change Deniers”.
Do 97% of Climate Scientists Really Agree? (4:36)
PetitionProject.org (1997-2007)
No Climate Change Emergency (.pdf)
John Coleman, Founder of The Weather Channel (2 mins)
Susan J. Crockford (polar bears)
Dr. Don Easterbrook / video video
Dr. Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace (video) (video) (article)
Exxon-Mobil’s funding of climate change skeptics
Greenhouse Gases
According to the dictionary greenhouse gases are defined as: Any of the atmospheric gases that contribute to the greenhouse effect by absorbing infrared radiation produced by solar warming of the Earth's surface. They include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (NO2), water vapour and fluorocarbons.
Yet the natural composition of air is 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen and 1% other gases (including carbon dioxide, hydrogen,) so how can carbon dioxide and nitrogen be “bad”?
Why Carbon Dioxide (CO2)?
To make any decision pollution must be measured, and the mainstream considers carbon dioxide (CO2) an indicator of fossil fuel combustion and pollution. Theoretically, CO2 emissions from the combustion of fossil fuels are outstripping the natural CO2 removal processes that keep the atmosphere in equilibrium.
“Whenever you burn conventional fuel, you create carbon dioxide. [....] The carbon dioxide is invisible, it is transparent, you can’t smell it, it is not dangerous to health, so why should one worry about it? Carbon dioxide has a strange property. It transmits visible light, but it absorbs the infrared radiation which is emitted from the earth. Its presence in the atmosphere causes a greenhouse effect [....] It has been calculated that a temperature rise corresponding to a 10 per cent increase in carbon dioxide will be sufficient to melt the icecap and submerge New York. All the coastal cities would be covered, and since a considerable percentage of the human race lives in coastal regions, I think that this chemical contamination is more serious than most people tend to believe.” Edward Teller, Physicist, 1959 (source)
“Significant temperature changes are almost certain to occur by the year 2000, and these could bring about climatic changes. [...] there seems to be no doubt that the potential damage to our environment could be severe. [...] pollutants which we generally ignore because they have little local effect, CO2 and submicron particles, may be the cause of serious world-wide environmental changes.” Stanford Research Institute report to the American Petroleum Institute (API) (source)
Humans have increased the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere by 40% over the past 150 years, primarily through the combustion of fossil fuels. (source)
The level of CO2 is also indicative of other combustion-related pollutants: nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides, methane, hydrofluoric carbon, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), lead, mercury, formaldehyde and others. (source?)
When does CO2 become a pollutant? by Roberta C. Barbalace (2006)
Malnourished bugs: Higher CO2 levels make plants less nutritious, hurting insect populations
Dr. Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace (video)
Why Nitrogen?
The natural composition of air is 78% nitrogen. Yet global institutions such as the World Economic Forum (AO News – Great Reset) are encouraging governments to restrict nitrogen in farming to “save the planet”. (article)
Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) – (article)
AO Comment
While the debate rages on about whether climate change is anthropogenic, the issue clouds other key factors – resource over-use, waste, destruction and resulting pollution. Whatever you believe about the source of climate change, fossil fuels and resource extraction are responsible for significant levels of pollution (emissions, tailings ponds, water contamination). Thus, reducing or ceasing fossil fuel production, transportation and use is presented by concerned citizens as a solution for climate change AND pollution. To that end, various countries are attempting to break their reliance on fossil fuels (alternative energy, carbon tax).
It is also coming to light that technology has enabled governments to alter weather, which they are undoubtedly doing both for good and ill (weather wars).
Generally, developing countries are more vulnerable to excessive weather conditions (storms, floods, droughts) than developed countries. When it is argued that developed countries have accelerated climate change, the implication is that the developed countries are responsible and so “owe” the developing countries. Some people think the climate change issue requires proof and a measure of the level of human impact, however, ultimately the dispute is immaterial. The real questions are “what should we do about it?”, “how much should we help other countries?” and “how much do we spend?”.
Importantly, it should be noted that the climate change/fossil fuel controversy obfuscates recognition that our human population appears to be growing beyond the resources of the planet. Simply, we must stop destroying the world’s environment (deliberately or accidentally) if we want to survive.
There is no final answer. We are making this up as we go so do your own research, make up your own mind, and act in the way your conscience dictates. Whatever decisions we make, our offspring will live (or die) with them.
The immense scope of politicized “climate change” rather than “pollution” or “weather war” seems to make the problem impossible to deal with. Yet, as the old saying goes, “one can eat an elephant one bite at a time”. Don’t lose hope. Fight one problem at a time.
The countries most vulnerable to climate change (source)
NEWS: Climate Change
(most recent first)
Other Climate Change Information:
Carbon Tax (wikipedia)
97% consensus (It’s Okay to be Smart (7 mins))
97% consensus (Dr. Roy Spencer (6 mins))
97% consensus (Andrew Says (13 mins))
Link to Ontario’s Air Quality Index
www.theguardian.com -- Alan Rusbridger podcasts:
Climate Engineering / Geoengineering / Cloud Seeding / Weather Modification / Chemtrails / Weather Warfare / Solar Radiation Management (SRM) / Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI)
It’s a fact -- some planes are spraying chemicals into the air (i.e. to limit insurance hazards such as large hailstones (article), rain to offset drought (article)). Also, scientists have tried/are trying to modify the weather to control climate and weather patterns (Dr. Michio Kaku).
Operation Popeye (Wikipedia) / (video 13 mins)
Operation Indigo Skyfold – global geo-engineering, day and night flights, over states and ocean including friendly nations, allegedly a chemical atmospheric “shield of protection” from enemies’ weapons of war or “solar radiation management” to protect us from the sun’s harmful rays.
· Pilots are kept in the dark, compartmentalized and kept on base for short terms.
· Underwater arrays, underwater robotic minions.
· Flying lower and lower to the point where long gun could do damage.
· Media are not allowed to report on these planes or their crashes.
· (article) (CBC documentary 46 mins)
· Chemtrail pilot speaks out: https://www.bitchute.com/video/5kYf10rvvJlC/
Skyfold Phase 2 - progress the drought further into the heartland east of California; very new technology makes chemtrails invisible.
Operation Flashpoint (FP-03) – remote detonation, self-destruct sequence, signal is encrypted through 3 satellites and cannot be jammed or blocked.
It is suspected that chemicals have been sprayed over protest groups to make protesters uncomfortable (article).
Proponents like Physics Professor Dr. Michio Kaku tout the benefits of weather control – for agriculture: droughts and floods, lightening suppression, hail suppression, biological responses, boundary layer energy exchange, remote sensing (.pdf); commercial: big events & sensitive buildings; and for military.
CIA Director John O Brennan speaking at the Council for Foreign Relations about geoengineering (specifically stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI)) on June 29, 2016 (video (2 mins)) (alternative)
Opponents show concern that the chemicals may be harmful to human health; and indignation that the population is being dosed without consent. They want to know, how pervasive is this practice?
High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP), a U.S. top secret military installation in Alaska that some believe is being used to weaponize the weather. (article) (article) (AO - Conspiracy Theories)
Graphene – used as an ice nucleating element and/or a biological carrier platform (dispersing pathogens like COVID-19) (video [mark 6:25]) and/or compounding the graphene oxide contained in some COVID-19 “vaccines” in the attempt to connect humans to the internet of bodies (IOB) (AO News – 5G & IOT/IOB)
www.geoengineeringwatch.org / Dane Wigington
https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/the-dimming-full-length-climate-engineering-documentary/
What it the World are they Spraying (2010)? (Youtube 1.5 hrs)
Why in the World are they Spraying (2012)? (Amazon $)
Other Information:
Carnegie Climate Geoengineering Governance Initiative (www.c2g2.net)
“It’s no longer an environmental story. This is a story where the science is settled and it’s now all about politics and economics.” Alan Rusbridger, editor-in-chief of The Guardian (source audio at 3:44)
“No challenge—no challenge—poses a greater threat to future generations than climate change. 2014 was the planet’s warmest year on record. Now, one year doesn’t make a trend, but this does—14 of the 15 warmest years on record have all fallen in the first 15 years of this century.” Barak Obama, President, USA (State of the Union Address 2015)
Return to AWARE-Ontario.ca Home Page
List of Ontario’s Issues
Disclaimer: This information has been compiled through private amateur research for the purpose of allowing the reader to make an informed and educated decision. However, while the information is believed to be reliable, completeness and accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
https://awareontario.nfshost.com/AWARE-Ontario/News%20Climate%20Change.htm
AO News - Climate Geoengineering
Articles: See issues/Tech_Weather
APPENDIX B Canada Wildfires 2023
|
Date |
Source |
Title |
Comment |
|
2023-06-10 |
Tiktok.com |
Northbay wildfire along pipeline (1 min)
|
Rockinrhino @rockinrhino1 |
|
2023-06-10 |
Slaynews.com |
Eco-Terrorist Groups Plotting ‘Summer of Chaos’ to ‘Create Mayhem’ across America
|
Frank Bergman [the mainstream narrative predictive programming] |
|
2023-06-10 |
True North |
The Alberta Roundup | Smith announces arson investigation
|
Rachel Emmanuel - unseasonably early - 175 wildfires have no known cause |
|
2023-06-10 |
Bitchute / Banned.Video |
Arson Driven Wildfires Being Used As Catalyst for Canadian FEMA (5 mins)
|
Greg Reese, InfoWars |
|
2023-06-10 |
Bitchute / Stew Peters |
|
Stew Peters interviews Odessa Orlewicz of Liberty Talk Canada |
|
2023-06-09 |
Facebook / True North |
The truth about the Canadian wildfires (12 mins)
|
Ratio’d with Harrison Faulkner |
|
2023-06-08 |
Boredpanda.com |
‘Not An Apocalyptic Movie Scene’: People Share What NYC Looks Like Right Now
|
Adelaide Ross and Justinas Keturka - NYC turns orange on June 7, 2023 - Blamed on wildfires - (Article re: missing ammonium nitrate, which coincidentally burns orange) |
|
2023-06-07 |
Twitter.com |
|
Poppi Starr @popstarr65 - backfire helicopter |
|
2023-06-06 |
The Counter Signal |
Arson carnage worsened by climate change, Gerald Butts says
|
Mike Campbell |
|
2023-06-05 |
Western Standard |
Police in NS say some fires deliberately set
|
Arthur C. Green - fine increased from $237.50 to $25,000 - ban on entering the woods |
|
2023-06-05 |
Twitter.com |
|
Concerned Citizen @cotupacs |
|
2023-06-04 |
Global News |
RCMP charge Alberta woman with 32 counts of arson after spring wildfires
|
Phil Heidenreich |
|
2023-06-02 |
Youtube / dutchsinse |
6/02/2023 -- ALL of S. Quebec Canada just erupted into fires - Canada under attack? DEW or people?!
|
|
|
2023-06-01 ~ |
Bitchute / DB’s Choice |
TikTok / @felicia.williams - NS retired forest technologist (.mp4)
|
Peter McIsaac |
|
2023-05-31 |
VancouverIsland.ctvnews.ca |
Woman arrested after string of fires intentionally set in Sooke
|
Todd Coyne |